Talk:Firecracker Cookie/@comment-47.36.222.72-20191115230833/@comment-32094364-20191121000826

Understandable! I see where you're coming from. For us, we try to make it a safety-based thing as a lot of people visit the wiki. After all, in general the information for this game isn't set in stone for anything and can definitely fluctuate, much in the way descriptions for cookies sometimes get tiny little modifications (Macaron has had two relatively large ones in the past few months for example), so we just try to put the category to the best of our abilities. As of now it has yet to be wrong, of course that doesn't make it infailable, but we don't just randomly slap it on either. (a lot of these are backed up by canon information, don't worry, we don't just randomly throw things together without a good chunk of proof. For example, Soda, Wizard, Cherry, etc showing up in children's day promos, blatantly young cookies like Onion and Peppermint, so on) Of course the people that don't care are never gonna care, so I feel you on that. It's moreso there for the people who do care. I can see why you wouldn't think it's relevant on a wiki too, like I said, it was popular request.