Thread:PassionatePubli/@comment-31642501-20200520080058/@comment-32094364-20200520184333

Correct, which is why I've never addressed it other than nodding to it as an oddity.

There is no gender neutral equivalent term and that is true, however, much like English and Japanese use a completely different name thus excluding the need for a gendered term in that context, there was no particular need to use such a masculine term.

(I am aware, yes, but again they didn't have to directly change it)

See, the thing is, I just want to see where they go with any of the ones where they're vague in Korean as well and see if they actually specify or if they continue to use nothing. If they go directly nonbinary, then I could easily adjust the rest, but I also wonder if the ones with nothing are meant to be considered "up to the viewer's interpretation" more than nonbinary. So I really just want them to use something for one of them, even if it ends up being it/ts. Mostly because of what they did to Peppermint and Snow Sugar for accuracy where they have nothing rather than leaving it/its, which is what makes me wonder if it's the interpretation thing. After all, absence of information does not make something else true either, so I'd rather not confirm something and then have it be backtracked. I suppose the big problem here really is the lack of definites.