Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25889587-20150815042241/@comment-25889587-20150817165616

Kevsuc wrote: My idea to solve the navbox issue is.. let's remove the images from navbox temporarily using the comment syntax, then include navbox to all pages that needs them, then paste the images back again. So you don't need to edit twice. Yeah that's exactly what I plan to do as well.

Pgrobban wrote: Let's see... we have 415 treasures, the article width is 704 px wide, that means with a width of 40 px we can fit 17 per row, which means we still need 25 rows to fill them all up. And with a height of 40 px per image, we get a height of 1000 pixels without any margins or padding. That's still too big in my opinion.

Edit: It's gonna be even bigger with the sections on the left side, since we will have fewer images per row.

Edit 2: Also, think about how horrible it will be for users on mobile data! Loading a few mb of images per page. Not to mention it probably won't look good on smaller phones. Yeah, to think that many people are accessing the site through mobile, it could consume so much data for them. However, making it smaller decreases the size of the image as well... or is it?